Message 397694 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	kj
Recipients	Kronuz, Nils Kattenbeck, gvanrossum, keithblaha, kj, levkivskyi
Date	2021-07-17.03:58:39
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> How far can/should we backport this? It will work in 3.10 and 3.9 without issues. However, I don't remember if bugfixes for __future__ features require special treatment/are excluded from normal bugfix backports. I vaguely remember us not backporting from __future__ annotations very far back (since they usually broke backwards compatibility). Maybe 3.10 is enough?

> How far can/should we backport this?

It will work in 3.10 and 3.9 without issues. However, I don't remember if bugfixes for __future__ features require special treatment/are excluded from normal bugfix backports. I vaguely remember us not backporting from __future__ annotations very far back (since they usually broke backwards compatibility).

Maybe 3.10 is enough?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-07-17 03:58:39	kj	set	recipients: + kj, gvanrossum, Kronuz, levkivskyi, Nils Kattenbeck, keithblaha
2021-07-17 03:58:39	kj	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2021-07-17 03:58:39	kj	link	issue41249 messages
2021-07-17 03:58:39	kj	create