Message 355661 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	Joel Croteau, Mark Borgerding, eric.snow, giampaolo.rodola, pablogsal, pitrou, pmpp, rhettinger, tim.peters
Date	2019-10-29.16:27:59
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> I'd argue such code deserves to be broken That argument falls flat with me and it doesn't show respect for our users. The proposal would be a major change to the "rules of the game" and would likely require discussion and buy-in on python-dev and perhaps a PEP. Please heed Antoine's advice. This is his area of expertise, and he has suggested a plausible way to go forward.

> I'd argue such code deserves to be broken

That argument falls flat with me and it doesn't show respect for our users.  The proposal would be a major change to the "rules of the game" and would likely require discussion and buy-in on python-dev and perhaps a PEP.

Please heed Antoine's advice.  This is his area of expertise, and he has suggested a plausible way to go forward.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-10-29 16:28:00	rhettinger	set	recipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, pmpp, eric.snow, pablogsal, Joel Croteau, Mark Borgerding
2019-10-29 16:28:00	rhettinger	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2019-10-29 16:28:00	rhettinger	link	issue36666 messages
2019-10-29 16:27:59	rhettinger	create