Message 326958 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nedbat
Recipients	ammar2, nedbat, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2018-10-03.10:08:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Yes, I agree that the assignment statement behavior is fine. The stacked decorator behavior is not. I understand that under the hood the two cases are very similar, but the syntax is different. Jumping back to the first decorator makes it look like the decorators are executed in order and then the first decorator runs again. There is nothing in the syntax that makes revisting the first decorator line reasonable.

Yes, I agree that the assignment statement behavior is fine.  The stacked decorator behavior is not.

I understand that under the hood the two cases are very similar, but the syntax is different.  Jumping back to the first decorator makes it look like the decorators are executed in order and then the first decorator runs again.  There is nothing in the syntax that makes revisting the first decorator line reasonable.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-10-03 10:08:21	nedbat	set	recipients: + nedbat, serhiy.storchaka, ammar2
2018-10-03 10:08:21	nedbat	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2018-10-03 10:08:21	nedbat	link	issue34876 messages
2018-10-03 10:08:21	nedbat	create