Message 317344 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	eric.snow, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2018-05-22.20:39:54
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
"That is relatively straight-forward except in one case: indicating that the other interpreter doesn't need the object to exist any more (similar to PyBuffer_Release() but more general)" Why an interpreter would access an object from a different interpreter? Each interpreter should have its own object space, no?

"That is relatively straight-forward except in one case: indicating that the other interpreter doesn't need the object to exist any more (similar to PyBuffer_Release() but more general)"

Why an interpreter would access an object from a different interpreter? Each interpreter should have its own object space, no?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-05-22 20:39:54	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, ncoghlan, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
2018-05-22 20:39:54	vstinner	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2018-05-22 20:39:54	vstinner	link	issue33608 messages
2018-05-22 20:39:54	vstinner	create