Message316362
> Is there any scenario where the following code would be useful...
Perhaps if someone, in search of a speedup, were sort of rolling their own lighter-weight equivalent to the typing module (in order to avoid importing the full typing module), but duck typed enough to fool the average type checker? Is that possible? |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018-05-10 13:48:45 | Ricyteach | set | recipients:
+ Ricyteach, eric.smith, ned.deily, lukasz.langa |
| 2018-05-10 13:48:45 | Ricyteach | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2018-05-10 13:48:45 | Ricyteach | link | issue33453 messages |
| 2018-05-10 13:48:45 | Ricyteach | create | |
|