Message 313513 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	tttnns
Recipients	lukasz.langa, mcepl, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tttnns
Date	2018-03-10.06:37:25
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
If we treat the original behavior as a bug, it’s much easier to write a patch that just changes the default behavior and never outputs a final blank line. I have looked through the testsuite of it. It seems that the original author had knew the final blank line and treat it as expect result. I’m not sure about it.

If we treat the original behavior as a bug,
it’s much easier to write a patch
that just changes the default behavior
and never outputs a final blank line.

I have looked through the testsuite of it.
It seems that the original author had knew
the final blank line and treat it as
expect result. I’m not sure about it.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-03-10 06:37:28	tttnns	set	recipients: + tttnns, mcepl, steven.daprano, lukasz.langa, serhiy.storchaka
2018-03-10 06:37:28	tttnns	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2018-03-10 06:37:27	tttnns	link	issue32917 messages
2018-03-10 06:37:27	tttnns	create