Message 305812 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	alex, barry, eric.araujo, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date	2017-11-08.09:38:43
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> Thus the following will start emitting DeprecationWarning by default again (as they did in 2.6 and earlier): > - experiments at the REPL This is backwards. If there's one place where you don't want stderr polluted with warnings (or any kind of logging), it's an interactive prompt. More generally, I think this entire proposal is unsound, and needs a PEP written to make its case clearly.

> Thus the following will start emitting DeprecationWarning by default again (as they did in 2.6 and earlier):
> - experiments at the REPL

This is backwards.  If there's one place where you *don't* want stderr polluted with warnings (or any kind of logging), it's an interactive prompt.

More generally, I think this entire proposal is unsound, and needs a PEP written to make its case clearly.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-11-08 09:38:43	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, barry, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, alex
2017-11-08 09:38:43	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-11-08 09:38:43	pitrou	link	issue31975 messages
2017-11-08 09:38:43	pitrou	create