Message 289728 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	davin, njs, pitrou, sbt, yselivanov
Date	2017-03-16.19:01:00
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
That issue seems to have stalled as it seems to have focussed on low-level APIs, and also because it is proposing a new module with the API question that entails. Another possible stance is that os.fork() should be left as-is, as a low-level primitive, and this functionality should be provided by the higher-level multiprocessing module.

That issue seems to have stalled as it seems to have focussed on low-level APIs, and also because it is proposing a new module with the API question that entails.

Another possible stance is that os.fork() should be left as-is, as a low-level primitive, and this functionality should be provided by the higher-level multiprocessing module.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-03-16 19:01:00	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, njs, sbt, yselivanov, davin
2017-03-16 19:01:00	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-03-16 19:01:00	pitrou	link	issue29828 messages
2017-03-16 19:01:00	pitrou	create