Message 285207 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	arigo
Recipients	arigo, benjamin.peterson, berker.peksag, ghaering, larry, lemburg, palaviv
Date	2017-01-11.10:23:31
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
If I had a say, I would indeed revert 030e100f048a (2.7 branch) and 81f614dd8136 (3.5 branch) as well as forward-port the revert to 3.6 and trunk. Then we wait for someone that really knows why the change was done in the first place.

If I had a say, I would indeed revert 030e100f048a (2.7 branch) and 81f614dd8136 (3.5 branch) as well as forward-port the revert to 3.6 and trunk.  Then we wait for someone that really knows why the change was done in the first place.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-01-11 10:23:31	arigo	set	recipients: + arigo, lemburg, ghaering, larry, benjamin.peterson, berker.peksag, palaviv
2017-01-11 10:23:31	arigo	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-01-11 10:23:31	arigo	link	issue29006 messages
2017-01-11 10:23:31	arigo	create