➜
See More

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients brett.cannon, davide.rizzo, gvanrossum, july, mwagner, neologix, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, vajrasky
Date 2016-11-09.18:35:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content 
Anyone have any major concerns with add_non_strict_resolve_pathlib_v4.patch?

I'd be quite happy without adding the extra parameter to Path.resolve(), but I'm not strongly offended.

From Guido's email we should default to strict=False (i.e. don't throw if the file doesn't exist) rather than True.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-11-09 18:35:54steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, pitrou, july, neologix, davide.rizzo, serhiy.storchaka, vajrasky, mwagner
2016-11-09 18:35:54steve.dowersetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2016-11-09 18:35:54steve.dowerlinkissue19717 messages
2016-11-09 18:35:54steve.dowercreate