Message 267178 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ChrisBarker
Recipients	ChrisBarker, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, michael.foord, r.david.murray, rbcollins
Date	2016-06-03.22:17:53
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Would that make folks more amenable to adding more "specialized" asserts? If so, then sure. I don't know that it takes a PEP (I hope not) but it would be good to have some guidance as to the direction we want unittest to take written down somewhere.

Would that make folks more amenable to adding more "specialized" asserts? If so, then sure.

I don't know that it takes a PEP (I hope not) but it would be good to have some guidance as to the direction we want unittest to take written down somewhere.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-06-03 22:17:53	ChrisBarker	set	recipients: + ChrisBarker, mark.dickinson, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord
2016-06-03 22:17:53	ChrisBarker	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2016-06-03 22:17:53	ChrisBarker	link	issue27198 messages
2016-06-03 22:17:53	ChrisBarker	create