Message 262089 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	serhiy.storchaka
Recipients	gvanrossum, lemburg, loewis, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2016-03-20.21:29:54
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Ah, I made a mistake! In 2.7 the first coding on the same line wins. And that behavior was from start. Regression was unintentionally introduced in issue18470. Thus there is a bug in Python 3. PEP 263 doesn't need more changes, but Python tokenizer and related tools do. Sorry for misleading.

Ah, I made a mistake! In 2.7 the first coding on the same line wins. And that behavior was from start. Regression was unintentionally introduced in issue18470.

Thus *there is* a bug in Python 3. PEP 263 doesn't need more changes, but Python tokenizer and related tools do.

Sorry for misleading.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-03-20 21:29:54	serhiy.storchaka	set	recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, lemburg, gvanrossum, loewis, vstinner
2016-03-20 21:29:54	serhiy.storchaka	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2016-03-20 21:29:54	serhiy.storchaka	link	issue26581 messages
2016-03-20 21:29:54	serhiy.storchaka	create