Message 241705 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	scoder
Recipients	gvanrossum, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2015-04-21.06:35:10
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> should inspect.isgenerator() be changed? Replying to myself, one thing that speaks against this approach is that "inspect" also has the functions "getgeneratorlocals()" and "getgeneratorstate()", which depend on "gen.gi_frame". Cython could emulate that, but normal user code usually can't. It's definitely not part of the Generator protocol but an implementation detail of GeneratorType.

> should inspect.isgenerator() be changed?

Replying to myself, one thing that speaks against this approach is that "inspect" also has the functions "getgeneratorlocals()" and "getgeneratorstate()", which depend on "gen.gi_frame". Cython could emulate that, but normal user code usually can't. It's definitely not part of the Generator protocol but an implementation detail of GeneratorType.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-04-21 06:35:10	scoder	set	recipients: + scoder, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, yselivanov
2015-04-21 06:35:10	scoder	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2015-04-21 06:35:10	scoder	link	issue24018 messages
2015-04-21 06:35:10	scoder	create