Message 179250 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	christian.heimes
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dtorp, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters
Date	2013-01-07.09:10:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I'm not too worried about the slightly increased memory usage. For example one of our largest application instances consumes about 8 GB memory right now. It has just about 22k tuples in gc.get_objects(). An additional Py_hash_t in tuple's struct would increase the memory usage by less than 200kB. I've attached a simple patch.

I'm not too worried about the slightly increased memory usage. For example one of our largest application instances consumes about 8 GB memory right now. It has just about 22k tuples in gc.get_objects(). An additional Py_hash_t in tuple's struct would increase the memory usage by less than 200kB.

I've attached a simple patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-01-07 09:10:28	christian.heimes	set	recipients: + christian.heimes, tim.peters, georg.brandl, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, dtorp, benjamin.peterson, meador.inge, serhiy.storchaka
2013-01-07 09:10:28	christian.heimes	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2013-01-07 09:10:28	christian.heimes	link	issue9685 messages
2013-01-07 09:10:27	christian.heimes	create