➜
See More

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author schmir
Recipients loewis, schmir, vstinner
Date 2013-01-01.21:48:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content 
socket getaddrinfo returns garbage:

>>> socket.getaddrinfo("python.org", 80)
[(2, 1, 6, '', ('82.94.164.162', 80)), (2, 2, 17, '', ('82.94.164.162', 80)), (2, 3, 0, '', ('82.94.164.162', 80)), (10, 1, 6, '', (10, '\x00P\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x01\x08\x88 \x00\x00\r')), (10, 2, 17, '', (10, '\x00P\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x01\x08\x88 \x00\x00\r')), (10, 3, 0, '', (10, '\x00P\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x01\x08\x88 \x00\x00\r'))]

yes, I would expect that python didn't give me garbage when calling getaddrinfo. Note that the caller didn't specify AF_INET6 this time!

Do you really think that this is not a bug?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-01 21:48:40schmirsetrecipients: + schmir, loewis, vstinner
2013-01-01 21:48:40schmirsetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2013-01-01 21:48:40schmirlinkissue16208 messages
2013-01-01 21:48:39schmircreate