Message 164077 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vinay.sajip
Recipients	bethard, chriz, eric.araujo, ned.deily, pwil3058, tshepang, vinay.sajip
Date	2012-06-26.13:56:30
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
You could consider just a small refinement: in the first loop in _SubParsersAction.__call__ where you look for the abbreviation, you can just set parser_name = p and break. Then the logic just below that can stay as it is: all you've done is morphed the abbreviation to the full command name.

You could consider just a small refinement: in the first loop in _SubParsersAction.__call__ where you look for the abbreviation, you can just set parser_name = p and break. Then the logic just below that can stay as it is: all you've done is morphed the abbreviation to the full command name.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-06-26 13:56:32	vinay.sajip	set	recipients: + vinay.sajip, bethard, ned.deily, eric.araujo, pwil3058, tshepang, chriz
2012-06-26 13:56:31	vinay.sajip	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-06-26 13:56:31	vinay.sajip	link	issue12713 messages
2012-06-26 13:56:30	vinay.sajip	create