Message 142424 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	eric.araujo
Recipients	eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, nadeem.vawda, orsenthil, sandro.tosi
Date	2011-08-19.12:04:56
SpamBayes Score	0.028102595
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> For these two reasons I propose to: > * document the 3 attributes as the suggested way to access this > information; > * deprecate the 3 getters; > * avoid to document the now undocumented getcode(); +1 > The addclosehook class could be provided via an alternative constructor I can’t say why, but I don’t like that.

> For these two reasons I propose to:
>  * document the 3 attributes as the suggested way to access this
>    information;
>  * deprecate the 3 getters;
>  * avoid to document the now undocumented getcode();
+1

> The addclosehook class could be provided via an alternative constructor
I can’t say why, but I don’t like that.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-08-19 12:04:57	eric.araujo	set	recipients: + eric.araujo, orsenthil, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi
2011-08-19 12:04:57	eric.araujo	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2011-08-19 12:04:56	eric.araujo	link	issue12707 messages
2011-08-19 12:04:56	eric.araujo	create