Message 102331 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	neologix
Recipients	neologix, nvetoshkin
Date	2010-04-04.11:18:17
SpamBayes Score	3.3842915e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
A patch to make select calls EINTR-safe is attached, but: - there are many modules that suffer from the same problem, so maybe a fix at select level would be better - if not, it could be a good idea to add this EINTR-retry handler to a given module (signal, os?) so that every module doesn't have to reimplement it (I know that at least subprocess does have one). Thoughts ?

A patch to make select calls EINTR-safe is attached, but:
- there are many modules that suffer from the same problem, so maybe a fix at select level would be better
- if not, it could be a good idea to add this EINTR-retry handler to a given module (signal, os?) so that every module doesn't have to reimplement it (I know that at least subprocess does have one).

Thoughts ?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-04-04 11:18:21	neologix	set	recipients: + neologix, nvetoshkin
2010-04-04 11:18:20	neologix	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-04-04 11:18:19	neologix	link	issue7978 messages
2010-04-04 11:18:18	neologix	create